Where The Money Is Flowing In Green Investing In 2022 - Economystery

Where The Money Is Flowing In Green Investing In 2022

Where The Money Is Flowing In Green Investing In 2022

  • Reading Time:23mn

There the money flies in green investments in

Welcome back to the Green Investor, who is driven in Investopedia. This week we deal with misunderstandings and confusion of environmentally friendly investments, which has led to a few final setbacks in the environment, in social and administration (ESG) to have similar and reliable information aboutUnveiling climate change. See an explanation for differences between the second archiving of a company and social responsibility or the ESG report of its companies, which is a great victory for ESG information on investments.

If investors and consumers are still looking for ways to use their money to combat climate change, companies will quickly start using their needs. After the administration of successful Greenergy companies such as Tesla, Ford and GMThe United States has already promised, both of them all electrical fleets in 2035. Ford van Ford has so far been over 120%.While the stocks have risen by around 35% and the Tesla shares have risen by around 26%. At the beginning of the start of 2022, keep an eye for movement with the new proposed work rule to facilitate the employees, to offer more ESG investment options for the pension plans of the workplace.

  • Podcast Green Investor only serves for information and training purposes and is not investment advice.
  • We will not make any recommendations for purchase, sale or specific or access, even though we can discuss financial products with our guests.
  • Mounted.
  • In this podcast, it can be mentioned or can sell on the market, but all listeners have to carry out their own research or consult a financial advisor or a broker before making investment decisions..
 Where the Money is Flowing in Green Investing in 2022-ECONOMYSTERY.com

Meet The Host

Caleb Silver, Director of Investopedia of Manager, gives you this podcast every second week on Thursday. Caleb is a business journalist with more than twenty-five years of experience. He has been managed since 2016.began to produce videos and documentaries of environmental education in New Mexico and South America.

Caleb Silver, Director of Investopedia of Manager, gives you this podcast every second week on Thursday. Caleb is a business journalist with more than twenty-five years of experience. He has been managed since 2016.began to produce videos and documentaries of environmental education in New Mexico and South America.

Mød David Callaway

In almost thirty years of experience, David Callaway is an inexpensive journalist and media and a long -term interest in climate change. As the founder and editor -i -chore of the CallaWay Climate Climate Climate Insights, David focuses on his publications, which is about the interface between the intermediate product between financial marketsand the environment report.

In almost thirty years of experience, David Callaway is an inexpensive journalist and media and a long -term interest in climate change. As the founder and editor -i -chore of the CallaWay Climate Climate Climate Insights, David focuses on his publications, which is about the interface between the intermediate product between financial marketsand the environment report.

It is difficult to set a real number of the problem of climate change. But if you look at the amount that the banks of the world, insurance companies and asset managers are currently bound in the fossil fuel industry, amazing twenty-two trillion dollars become an amazingDollars come. Fossil fuels make an important contribution to climate change on the one hand, but their assets and investments also have a high risk, and the investment risk that they form for investors is also enormous.

How this dynamic player is the question of the coming decade, and David Callaway, our guest this week, examined this carefully. He is a business journalist and director and founder and manufacturer of Callaway Climate Insights Newsletter and Substantic.

David, you are a business journalist. They are a news manager. They have as President of Testreed.com stints. Are they editor of the United States today. What did you do to cover the climate change and the creation of your newsletter?

Well, Caleb, I was always interested in climate change. I have always been interested in extreme weather and environmental tremism.Or six years I noticed that the media simply did not do a good job to take climate change into account. We could not exist the political dispute whether it existed or not.

After selling my last company, I started looking at what I wanted to do afterwards. Interesting for this climate. And I thought: “Let us assume that climate change will happen whether this error is and cover business activitiesAnd what they call a soft climate change because it is already.

It is already here.How do we have to deal with it? There is a company that grows around him, and it means ... it has expression, ESG, the environment, social and control over the guy in everything, but not many have done so.Callaway Climate Insights hit at the time when Covid-19 scored.I found fascinating.

I mean, in the past eighteen months I have developed a completely new universe of sources and experts and people with whom I have to do. It was all, from my beautiful world center outside of San Francisco.

Podcast Green Investor only serves for information and training purposes and is not investment advice. We will not make any recommendations for purchase, sale or specific or access, even though we can discuss financial products with our guests.Mounted. In this podcast, it can be mentioned or can sell on the market, but all listeners have to carry out their own research or consult a financial advisor or a broker before making investment decisions.

Like all good business journalists David, they follow the money and the money has been filled in ESG, SRI, climate technology and climate transmissions in the past ten years, but investors are still misunderstood. What are the greatest misunderstandings that most areHave investors about these topics?

One of the greatest things you hit in your intro is that if we just stop producing oil and coal and using it to produce electricity, everything would be better.In fund management companies there are twenty-two trillion dollars of values for fossil fuels. You can't just close it. Solution, right?

If we can only convince the bad leaders of fossil fuels, simply to stop or convince the bad banks, not to invest in them. It is one of the greatest misunderstandings, and we always see it with these huge number of climate in Glasgow, where everything fromProtest is much more difficult, Caleb.The same applies to one reason a transition from fossil fuels. We have to move quickly due to the dangers of climate change, but not so quickly that we want to increase the global economy with this transition to renewable energies.

The costs of renewable energies are generally falling. The costs for fossil fuels increase. The economy takes over and we want a transition, but we have to make sure that this is done. I think the other great misunderstanding has Caleb people who have this,By simply investing in an ESG fund or an ESG purchase fund to clarify the world of climate change, right? No stupid people.

You knew that the world moves climate change. I believe that many of these agents have oil companies.Why the car companies have to be the greatest pollution of the fund. Investors must be very careful.

You have to decide what you want to achieve.

There was a big setback against ESG and some companies that have recently created these rankings for shares.Contribution that you make to reduce climate change. This gushes now. You can expect that in this industry, which in turn is subjected to this development, no revolution.Or does it buy what companies can escape? How do you think, should we be there?

I think what we really ... you mentioned some earlier ESG literations in your introduction. For example, socially responsible investments, right? These abbreviations change over time, and the reason why you are doing is that you areAll bad abbreviations for that are what we are talking about.And ESG can be the poorest of all. I think that they think ecologically, ok can be everything, from smoking cigarettes to the wearing of masks in public. The management is generally defined as corporate management.

There is diversity in the meeting room, in their executive lines, the same wages. What are they really. A stricter definition of what investors look like and contribute to it.

I predict when this matures, the fund industry runs like a trailer. All jumps in it and then setbacks, the means stop selling, and they start with more targeted means that hopefully have better descriptive names what that does.That I concentrate on entrepreneurs who develop the ideas to eliminate the world to remove coal from the air from the sea.Therefore, sustainable fashion is the type of company that will generate the sale strictly, more resources in the future.

And want to search for investors.At the moment, most ESG funds simply record shares in another description.

On the right we said in the section that some of the ten top minus ten owners are comparable to different trillion dollars, such as Blackrock and their ESG in sustainability obligations? We know that it was a major problem, especially for Larry Fink, President and CEO ofBlackrock, but they see that others do it too. The ones who go where the money is or where they believe that young money is going.

But if you are committed to the size or size of a black stone or another company, does this mean as much as it sounds?

I have covered these fund managers for a long time according to his words when he says we should do something. And I think customers. I think I think from concern for risk. Black rock is undoubtedly the largest owner of assets in the world.

Perhaps the Norway oil fund is greater, but they have a great risk in some of these companies that they have. They take a lot of abuse because in many cases they are passive fund managers, which is why they have everything that companies comprise fossil fuelsI take her with her words. If I see that you are going there and that you actually have negotiations and discussions with some of your shares and try to influence the voices of Proxy, and I think we're going in the right direction. Not enough.

But I think the more you see that people like Larry Fink become active in the debate, you will see that other business leaders, especially younger, also accept this challenge.

I think you have 100% correct. The risk of what your company does somehow, so you are in danger. As investors or those who take off with black skirt that are our customers, you also have this riskDrives a lot, but I also think that there is something to say where the puck leads and the boy goes here. Finance. Where was the big money going and who is behind the money?

I tell you, it is interesting, Caleb. A bit very sexy on a bit, and you will never really see it, except in a few cases. Venture money is in battery companies. There are a good one, at least it sounds like you are doingDoing things.

They didn't have a good year this year. The money that comes this year was in the coal storage company, the coal suck from the sky and store them in the ground or produce coal and stuff the coal. This is a bit confusing for me.Think there are at least three dozen of those that I have recently seen in a table, and they all get a lot of money from VCS. And none of them have a product that actually does what they say on the required scale to say toto deal with climate change.

A fund manager recently informed me that if you have added all these carbon companies that the VC money was ... and we are trying to limit the increase in temperature to 1.5 or 2%, it will now be oneThe risk of 2.7% is too hot and will lead to more disasters. But this man said if you suck all coals that can do these companies, this would come less than a tenth of a tenth 1% of thatWhat we have to do to lower the temperature, but when it is said, this VC money will go.

These boys, they are practiced by throwing and hoping for twenty different companies, and hope to beat great, and then they are profitable. It seems to be the section de Jure, at least 2021.

What about the financing of companies? Are they the large VC companies Silicon Valley, which we all know from Internet 1.0 and 2.0, Andreessen Horowitz and Sequoias and smaller, or is this a new harvest of risk capital companies that have come into this sectorwho searched for these returns?

It is a new harvest. You cannot see smaller and the Andreessen Horowitz is as much in this game as before. For most things, they still do a kind of old school technology and things that we at least call old school.Breathershrough Energy Ventures, Bill Gates Product for Prelude. There are many different ones that are relatively new and are fewer resources. They are in hundreds of millions or so, maybe billions, but not massive as a scene. Expansion they consist of very rich philanthropes.

Some of them from Internet Tech 1.0 who have earned all their money and seem to do something in the room of climate change.Big affair, regardless of whether it is coal or battery memory or electric vehicles or what you have. It will be interesting because some of these things will follow. If you have a look at where we were fifteen years ago, there was a kind of money outbreak,which was occupied in the professions and then pure technology companies.

And normally the financial crisis steps out of the water in and '08. But some of these companies survived, and they are some of the solar companies that are now tall, techwell and electric.de, Large Sun Company. The most people look at time asFailure for pure technology, the survivors are doing well and we want to see ... You can say that the markets are on the way to a rough tone. I think they are in 2022The glare of ESG comes - the story and the survivors will be the ones they want to absorb if these clouds have passed.

Podcast Green Investor only serves for information and training purposes and is not investment advice. We will not make any recommendations for purchase, sale or specific or access, even though we can discuss financial products with our guests.Mounted. In this podcast, it can be mentioned or can sell on the market, but all listeners have to carry out their own research or consult a financial advisor or a broker before making investment decisions.

Article Sources

1. Image Source:Click Here

2. Image Source:Click Here